lalitkaul

Article 370: Claims of Abrogation by BJP & Cries for Restoration by PAGD (New Depths of Political Prostitution) The BJP government exhumed the skeleton of buried horse-Article 370- and brought it to life like Allah, in Al Quran, has the ability to reconstruct humans on the ‘Day of Judgement’ even while no bones remained in the graves and the ashes of “dis-believers” were immersed/dissolved in rivers! BJP attributed armed insurgency in J&K by Muslims inspired by Islam’s Ideology to Article 370. And laying all the blame for it at the door step of Nehruji because according to BJP and its Social media experts Nehruji gifted Article 370 to Sheikh Abdullah because 1) they were friends and 2)   Nehruji was pro-Muslim. Further the claim that was made was “had Sardar Patel been the PM, Kashmir problem wouldn’t have been there”! But in ‘Sardar Patel’s Correspondence, 1945-1950, Vol1’, it’s documented on page 86 as “ Jammu and Kashmir thus became an integral part of India in October 1...

Kashmir: Threats to Kashmiri Pandits- It’s Not Muslims It’s Islam Mr. Home Minister   (Checkmate Islam before it Devours Civilized Indian Nation) Lalit K Kaul It’s Islam that has to be shown its place in the civilized world, not the Muslims. And Islam can have no place in the civilized heterogeneous world of inanimate and animate beings. Because its history of existence has left non-debatable/unquestionable proofs of the kinds and magnitude of barbarism its followers unleashed on pre-Islamic civilizations and annihilated their culture, belief systems, religious practices and symbols of heritage. And its followers continue to unleash barbarism across the Globe through Islamic organizations like JKLF, HM (Party of Holy Fighters), LET (Army of the Pure/Righteous), HUA (Movement of the Helpers of Prophet Muhammad), HuJI (Movement of Islamic Holy War), HuM (Movement of Holy Warriors), ISIS, ISIS(K), Al Qaeda JUD (Society for Proselytization), JeI, etcetera. And these organizations...

Independent India: Panun Kashmir Movement for Homeland (Political Empowerment) Colonial India: INC Movement for Independence from British Rule Lalit K Kaul Second one was the civilizational imperative and First one is the National Shame. Yes, an unprecedented one at that because nowhere in world of Nations, citizens have become refugees in their own country. Yet, there are many similarities between the two Movements. Colonization of Indian subcontinent: Mughal Emperor Jahangir allowed the British East India Company to trade and set up its first factory in 1613 at Surat. The Company grew so strong as to militarily challenge the then Nawab of Bengal on June 23, 1757 and under the leadership of Robert Clive defeated the Nawab to take complete control of Bengal. Over the next hundred years, it continued to expand its control over vast territories in the rest of Indian subcontinent and Burma. Post first war of Independence in 1857 which was lost to British army, in 1858 the Brit...

  Azad J&K Gets what It Opted For in Oct 1947. India Should Keep Off Lalit K Kaul Nation States founded on an irrational ideology are bound to have an unpleasant existence with uncertain future and forgettable past. A (community of) people who derive their entity/uniqueness solely from their   religion while derecognizing their cultural, linguistic and ethnic dimensions becomes intrinsically intolerant to a heterogeneous society which could be multi-religious with common ethnicity, language (with various dialects) and overlapping cultures (due to geographical and environmental differences) in the region. This heterogeneous society could be multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, multi-religious and with diverse cultures, like Indian society. A Nation defined solely on the basis of religion has the weakest foundation because religion is ever changeable as witnessed in the history of human civilizations. Many religions have evolved since the birth of this universe and people ha...

  Mehbooba to Join Jantar Mantar Rally if Statehood with “Special Status” is Asked For Lalit K Kaul It’s JKNC backed government in J&K UT and therefore Sheikh Abdullah's outfit will not ask for restoration of “Special Status” to J&K. In the bygone three decades whenever Farooq Abdullah was out of power he talked about restoring “pre-1953” situation in J&K insofar as it’s political relationship with the Indian Union was concerned. Now that JKPDP is out of power it has taken upon itself to champion the cause of “Special Status” for J&K. The undeclared/unsigned agreement between the two outfits is- when out of power raise “Special Status” bogey. The political goal of both the “mainstream” political outfits is to keep the (communalistic and anti-India) passions alive in the Valley, while savouring fruits of political power. No different from this capped, bearded, but moustache less specie (Moulvis) preparing youths for “shahadat” with this assurance that Allah h...