India Lives in Villages - Sri M K Gandhi : Lalit K Kaul
India Lives in
Villages – Sri M K Gandhi
Lalit K Kaul
Village is the basis (fundamental
unit) of Swaraj. How possibly can a village be defined?
In the era prior to the advent of modern technology
and associated advances in the means of transportation and information sharing, leading to the ease of travel
and ideas exchange; the people living in different geographical locations
mostly remained confined to it and its surroundings. The natural outcome of
this confinement was to be that the communities living in disconnected
geographical areas evolved on their own-may be differently from others- by way
of interacting within their commune as also with the surrounding Mother Nature.
It may be said that because of this intra community dynamics evolved a locally
acceptable World View that defined a Value System comprising Right Vs Wrong,
Moral Vs Immoral and Ethical Vs Unethical. The social, economical and political
conduct came to be governed by the institutionalized Value System. This socio
economic political set up that bound people together may be called a Village.
So, it may be said that there existed village based civilization.
Travel or movement from one place to another
was either by foot and/or bullock cart. So, the accessibility to villages in
other geographical areas may have been defined by the transit time. The lesser
the transit times the more the accessibility leading to interactions with
different village based civilizations. A totally decentralized set up with the possibilities
of one merging into the other for enabling access to wider spectrum of human
and natural resources, willingly or otherwise. The ease of accessibility to
surrounding villages may have also contributed to inter village trade; cultural
exchanges and exchange of ideas insofar as relationship of this Human to the
Mother Nature is concerned. It can be expected that feasibility of such
interactions may have facilitated evolution of the Value System to accommodate different
World Views thereby rendering it mutable. Evolution of innumerable languages can
be said to be a direct outcome of this decentralized set up as ordained by the
geography and constrained movement of people due to limitations of the means of
transport. Cultural diversity can be a direct outcome of this geographical
separation which was not easy to overcome.
So, it may be said that institutionalized Swaraj
in the true sense of the word existed.
In the modern world/civilization it is said
that the World is one Global Village and that the revolutions in transport
industry and information science has made it possible. The information
technology and transportation means have integrated the hitherto inaccessible areas
at such a scale that was incomprehensible, say, even 30 years ago or less.
Owning a mobile phone may have no relationship with the economic status of an
individual because they are available to people of all strata. With digitization
of economy and ever diminishing dependence on paper currency, these mobiles are
being used by the smallest vendors to receive payments for the sale of their
goods including the payments they make for buying their inventory. Distance is
no constraint; sitting in Kashmir one can make payment to a distributer in
Trivanthapuram through his/her mobile and goods would be received in time. The
reason why these small footpath vendors prefer digital payment for their sale
is that it secures them from any chance of losing their hard earned money by
accident or under duress.
The proliferation of mobile phones is quite matched
by that of two wheelers; added to all this is the network of highways and river
ways that are being built to reduce commutation time. The whole infrastructure
is laid only to integrate each and every nook and corner of this land mass
called India. The underlying motives may be questionable / debatable; the
economic policies can be questioned / debated; the degeneration of political
system and politics based on falsehoods & half truths can be questioned / debated;
there can be no two opinions on these issues. Alternative to present political
dispensation is the most urgently required as is the search for growth and
development model that affords each one to make a livelihood on the strength of
his/her knowledge base so that this stigma of ‘being poor’ and perpetuating
existence on doles is done away with for a dignified existence that allows an
individual make his/her own choices in his/her personal world.
But, in today’s world,
How do we define a village?
In today’s world the basis for Swaraj need not
be a Village, in the traditional sense; but a democratic set up that allows direct
and not indirect way of electing people’s representatives. So, the question may
be framed as: What can be the fundamental unit that enables people to choose /
elect their representatives directly to various Assemblies and the Parliament? The contemporary system of elections deprives people
of that fundamental right.
In my opinion, whatever be the limitations of
Rakesh Tikait & the attempts of other vested interests to hijack his
platform; basically he is questioning the Parliamentary Democracy; MSP etc are
not the issues as the government has
shown willingness to accommodate the farmers’ demands including putting a hold
on the new laws for 1 ½ to 2 years. He is not budging as he wants laws to be
repealed & that’s the political message. January 26 flag hoisting hijacked
his agenda & farmers started distancing themselves from him. His fallibility
lies in the kind of threatening language he uses. Yet the message is loud &
clear that has rattled the government. Slapping of charges against him
including imprisonment may not annihilate the political seed that he has sown.
If it sinks in the minds of well meaning people, his demand may usher in an era
of new politics.
Comments
Post a Comment