lalitkaul

  Article 370 35A and Pakistan                                                                                                                        Lalit K Kaul Pakistani media is crying hoarse about abrogation of the Article 370 and 35A by the Indian Parliament on 05 08 2019 and the PM and FM of Pakistan have been saying that there shall be no talks with India unless these said articles are restored! In Hindi there is a saying which goes like: “बेगानी शादी में अब्दुल्ला दीवाना بیگانی شادی میں عبدللہ دیوانہ                               आपजी कौन मै खामखाह “                                                  “ آپ جی کون مہ خامخاہ The above public statement of Pakistan PM and FM smacks of arrogance and impertinence, but this quality they have inherited from the founder of Pakistan who was arrogance personified and never true to his word. Pakistani political leadership, if there is any, ought to know that no nation, big or small and powerful or weak, is dying to talk to the ot

  Well Done Gupkar Gang You Kept Your Inheritance Spotless Lalit K Kaul While Sheikh Mohd Abdullah is awaiting the “Kayamat Ka Din”/ “The Day of Judgement” in his grave for his possible journey to the Jannat to have a rendezvous with 72 Hoors, his brand of politics has been kept alive by his generation next and the other political parties too have chosen to take a leaf out of his political legacy. Sheikh’s politics was time variant and he had mastered the art of ‘running with the hare and hunting with the hound’. In his quest to gain political power his first master stroke was to change the name of his political outfit ‘Muslim Conference’ to ‘National Conference’ as that helped him gain proximity to the leaders of Indian National Congress who had been leading the independence struggle against the British rule in India. His rationale, logic, ethics, morals in the context of his political aspirations followed the swing of a pendulum; his narrative on J&K in regard to the Indian

  To Trust PAGD is Suicidal Mr. Prime Minister Lalit K Kaul History of a place has its variants like, 1) Documented History, 2) History of experiences and 3) History as conveyed through word of mouth. First one can be biased because the historian may have certain political inclinations, but the last two are factual unbiased versions of what indeed the people experienced and were conveyed to them through word of mouth down the generations. Politicians are inclined to narrate the history in the way that serves their political interests and therefore their version(s) cannot be trusted with. The people of erstwhile state of J&K have been the victims of distorted history as publicly narrated day in and day out by their depraved leadership; the costs of which are impossible to estimate. The J&K society stands communally divided and traumatized the reasons for which are too well known to be once again narrated here, yet a few points are in order. History as per Experience: