It's not about Religion It's about India's Dismemberment: Lalit K Kaul

 It's not about Religion It's about India’s Dismemberment 

                                                                                               Lalit K Kaul

Statement 1: No Muslim on this Earth lives life as per the dictates and advise of Prophet Muhammad.

Statement 2: The likes of Sri Ram, Sri Krishna, Shiv, Prophet Muhammad, Baghwan Budh, Bhagwan Mahavir, Jesus, Guru Nanak Guru Angad Guru Amar Das Guru Arjan Dev Guru Hargobind Guru Har Rai Guru Har Kishan Guru Teg Bahadur Guru Gobind Singh, Abraham, Moses, will all live in the minds of people until the Deluge and thereafter and the likes of us shall be forgotten few days after demise; therefore, no ordinary mortal is qualified to belittle them.

Therefore, any discord, disagreements, discontent among the members of a society need to be resolved in ways not derogatory of those who defined civilized behaviour for ordinary mortals.

How to interpret the response of Muslims in 14 Indian States to the statement of an individual made in regard to Prophet Muhammad? Those who don’t follow their religion in their day-to-day life, who motivated them to come to streets in thousands issuing death warrants to the concerned individual? Offering prayers as per religious dictates doesn't mean compliance with religion and it is applicable to people belonging to all religions.

Remember Khillafat Movement: 

Sri M K Gandhi supported the movement with the aim of forging Hindu- Muslim unity as he believed that without that unity the independence would be of no avail. The last 75 years of the divided Indian subcontinent has, indeed, proved him right.

The Muslim leadership that included intellectuals, Moulvis, Maulanas and politicians had altogether different covert aim in initiating Khilafat movement; while they hoped to at least retain Khalifa in Turkey even while the Ottoman Empire may collapse, they were also engaged in inviting Afghans to attack India to fight alongside of native Muslims against the British so that Khalifa rule could be established in the Indian subcontinent and once again the Hindus would be subjugated to Islamic rule. During the movement, Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad is on record having stated that India was not a pious place for Muslims to live in and therefore they must migrate to Afghanistan! The migration that ensued ended up in huge tragedy, while Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad went on to become first Education Minister of India! The day it was clear that Turkey was going to be a secular democratic State, they engineered Moplah riots. When asked about riots, Sri M K Gandhi responded,” they have acted as per their religion”.

What did Khilafat Movement yield?

It mobilized Muslim masses across the subcontinent strengthening Muslim League as its offices were opened in all towns and cities across the subcontinent and, indeed, a genuine Muslim unity was enforced to create a near monolith. It was this political organization of Muslims that was supremely instrumental in consolidating the demand for a separate Muslim Nation and which culminated in creation of Pakistan.

And not to forget Kashmir:

Immaculate planning with secrecy maintained over one and a half decades before it all seemed to erupt in 1991. The documentation of the inner most details of Kashmiri Pandits’ for execution of a pre planned targeted killings, loot, and rape of men both young and old, properties, and women both young and old; respectively. All the execution had the professionalism that the likes of Bill Gates, Ford and our own Ambani and Adani and their ilk would envy. The precision of a telescopic gun and ruthlessness of a leopard was all motivated by the zeal of establishing Nizam e Mustafa; the choice was to convert, flee or get murdered. The first step forward in the long term aim of establishing rule by Sharia in India. The process is going on as the targeted killings have once again started.

The anti CAA Protests:

The intent was made very clear by their ideologues in JNU, AMU, Jamia Milia Islamia and their political leaders, the Moulvis and the Maulanas duly supported by Half Muslims. The open declaration of seize of Chicken Neck; the declaration by a Moulvi in W Bengal Assembly elections that he would create another Pakistan, if voted to power; the open denial of India as one entity by a girl student in one of such educational institutions; the sloganeering “Pakistan Zindabad" in the public program organized by Asaddudin Owaisi; the videos shown by TV Channels in which the Maulanas were instigating their followers to dig graves for Kafirs, etc. are all preparations to achieve the ultimate political aim of dismembering India. These are ominous indicators and not protestations by some misguided youth.

What lends credibility to such analysis as in the preceding paragraph is the fact that CAA had no clause to harm Indian Muslims who had stayed back post partition for their own reasons; the fear that it would harm illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and Myanmar, they raised hue and cry and this not because of any love for those Muslims, but for the fear of reduced numbers in achieving the aim of India break up. 

Indifference of Indian political leadership:

A classic example was set up by the “Hindutva” leader Sri A B Vajpayee who defined Sri Mufti Mohammad Sayeed as an embodiment of “Insaaniyat, Kashmiriat and Jamooriat" the same one who in 1986 as a test sample had organized vandalization of temples and killing of Pandits to assess the counter response of the National leadership of India. What a triumph and a confidence booster it was for the Islamists to carry out their campaign in the state, when the national leadership chose to look the other way. The forced exodus of Pandits for establishment of Nizam e Mustafa, that would transform them in to refugees, was a foregone conclusion & nobody was to shed a tear.

Another example was set up when the “Hindutva” party chose to form government in the state of J&K with the one who had publicly thanked the terrorists, Pakistan and Hurriyat for allowing peaceful elections in the state. 

Two classic examples of turning a blind eye and deaf ear to the political aim of Islamists.

What Indians should always keep in mind?

Islam is a religion that has ingrained political content; its political aim is to govern the whole world by Islamic principles and doctrine. Ask Europe and in particular Germany and Britain. Since Islam is declared to be universal therefore, the Muslims are to derecognize the demarcating boundaries between Nation States and endeavour by all means to establish Sharia across the Globe. 

This political ideology of Islam needs to be countered only politically and not by belittling the Immortal; belittling further unifies them in the path of Allah and that's establishing Nizam e Mustafa in India. 

What Indian Political Leadership should not loose sight of?

No matter to which political party the politicians may belong to, they can rule India only if it survives; therefore, for the sake of votes let no one turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the political aim of Islamists. They need to be put in their proper place before they grow to become all devouring monsters.