Ajmer Sharif: Example of how to do politics under the garb of Sufism: Lalit k kaul

Ajmer Sharif Dargah – Example of how to do politics under the garb of Sufism

                  Lalit K Kaul

Indian Muslims follow their own Islam that violates basic tenets of Islam as handed down in parts to Prophet Muhammad by Allah through Gabriel. Yet they call themselves followers of Islam, is singularly unique political game played ever in the history of Human race. Indian Moulvis Maulanas and Muftis look the other way, if not publicly encourage this version of Islam because it suits their long-term political plan of disintegrating India; some from among them are bold enough to publicly pronounce it. Keeping the political angle aside, the Indian Muslims propelled by their clergy feel free to twist and turn their Faith and don't consider it as an (the) insult to Prophet Muhammad, but a factual statement made by a non Muslim about their Prophet makes them bring out bombs, swords and all that they have and even behead those who supported that factual statement! These kinds of acts are initial stages of their diabolical political game against Hindustan. Let nobody nurture any doubts on that and say “ they are anti social elements, misguided youth", etc. By the act of beheading, they have declared an open war on non-Muslims; particularly Hindus.

Is it not Shirq?

Imagine Sunnis worshipping the grave of a Muslim- whatever be his standing among the masses- and yet calling them Muslims. These Sunnis object to bowing to Indian Tricolour and their Capped Bearded Moustachless specie make lot of noise on TV Channels & these channels too needle them further to gain TRP points. Surya Namaskar and Vande Matram are anathema to Islam, they pronounce; but bowing their heads in front of a grave is not.  

This Muslim colleague of mine visited my house; chatted for a long time; asked a few questions about Hindu Faith; and then told me,” What have we come to? We worship graves". “that's not Islam". The likes of him are not part of the diabolical political game plan of Capped Bearded Moustachless specie who find enormous support among Half Muslims. Yet, the likes of him don't matter because their Faith is in Ibaadat to Allah and they are organically related to Indian soil.

Sometime in 2014, in Saudi Arabia a proposal was made to destroy the tomb of Prophet Muhammad and remove his remains from the grave; as per then media reports. The tomb of Prophet Muhammad is the 2^nd holiest spot for Muslims across the world, the first being Mecca. This proposal was made because Muslims were treating the grave in an idolatrous way; because grave was being worshipped. And that was Shirq. What happened thereafter is not known, as the shifting would have created tensions between Sunni and Shia.

Few days ago, a well known Indian political analyst stated in Arzoo Kazmi show that the grave in the Saudi Arabia had been shifted and to this Ms. Arzoo Kazmi didn't respond in Yes or No.

Moinuddin Chisti:

Supposedly a Sufi Saint whose dead body (grave) is housed in Ajmer Sharif Dargah. Lot many claims have been made and justifications given by Islamic Scholars about how Sufism is a part of Islam; with due apologies, I take that with a pinch of salt.

Moinuddin Chisti a 13^th century “Sufi saint” born in modern day Iran came to Delhi during the reign of Sultan Iltutmish, 1236 CE, moved to Ajmer and became highly influenced by Sunni Hanbali thought. Hanbali school is the strict traditionalist school of jurisprudence in Sunni Islam; it does not accept istihsan (jurist discretion) or ‘urf (customs of a community) as a sound basis to derive Islamic law, a method that Hanafi and Maliki Sunni madh'habs accept, in cases where there is no clear answer in Sacred texts of Islam. It derives Sharia primarily from the Holy Quran, the Hadiths (sayings and customs of Prophet Muhammad, and the views of Sahabah (Prophet Muhammad’s companions).

Hanbali school experienced a reformation during the 18^th century Wahhabi movement. Wahhabism is a Sunni Islamic revivalist and fundamentalist movement associated with the reformist doctrines of the 18^th century Arabian Islamic scholar, theologian, preacher and activist Muhammad ibn Abd al- Wahhab. Particular emphasis was on purging practices such as the veneration of Muslim saints and pilgrimages to their tombs and shrines. It is said to be an Islamic ‘reform movement' to restore “pure monotheistic worship" by devotees.

Having been influenced by Hanbali school which later bent towards Wahhabism; how possibly can he be a Sufi Saint? It's a question that comes to mind. Another question that comes to mind is: how compatible are Sharia and Sufism with each other? May be some more reading is required before this question finds an answer.

So, it may be inferred that Moinuddin Chisti belonged to Hanbali school and was an orthodox Sunni Muslim and not a Sufi Saint. And it suited the Muslim king as in the garb of Sufism, he succeeded in attracting stupid minded Hindus in to his fold and thus that much reduced Hindu resistance to Muslim King.

It may sound incredible, but the historical fact is that right from emperor Akbar down to Aurungzeb and Dara Shiko visited Ajmer Sharif Dargah; Dara Shiko visiting is quite understandable, but other Mogul kings visiting is violation of Sunni Islam. When it comes to politics of governance then religion has to take a back seat. Akbar thoroughly enjoyed his power wearing a garb of Sufi Islam; when questioned by an orthodox Islamic scholar about his un-Islamic ways, the emperor replied,” I am able to rule over them peacefully”. Sufism , per say, didn't find much favour with orthodox Sunni Islam, but was used as a convenient tool to manage non Muslims and rule over them.

The Economics of Ajmer Sharif Dargah:

Ironically propelled by those who were always the target of Islamic sword; and the threats of beheading and the very act of beheading by “Khadims" of Dargah has exposed them all beyond all doubts, hesitations and apprehensions. The true face of Moulvis Maulanas and Mufti including their politicians is exposed. The farce of Sufism has come out in the open and it was bound to be because Islam isn't the  religion that professes love and compassion for all irrespective of their Faith and belief system; many verses in the Holy books of Islam stand testimony to that fact. Well, it's there to stay and it has a very rich history of ruling nearly whole world for 1200 years.

No purpose is served by criticizing Islam or any other Faith. It's not the Faith but the political ideology of Islam that needs to be countered politically. Very much like the Christians (Protestants) achieved the fall of Ottoman Empire without bringing in religion that is Islam.

The Clarion Call by Khadims to Boycott Hindus:

The Hindus need to realize that feeding those, who are ever planning to slit their throats, under the garb of Sufism has to stop. No donations should be made to any Islamic institution; Dargah and Mosque and/or the beggars on the street. Hindus need to realize that all these donations get funneled into the corpus of Jihad against Kafirs. Hindus should not rely on so called Hindutva outfits because every outfit is sold out to Muslims for sake of votes.

Non cooperation with Hindus and their boycott is the clarion call given by “Khadims" of Dargah; Hindus should respond to it full throttle in all walks of human endeavours and ensure that on socio-economic plane there is no interaction between the two. If followed, it would be the most appropriate way to respond to the clarion call given by “Khadims” of Dargah. Let first the Dargah become a deserted place with business establishments getting locked for good.

No Dargah is going to emancipate a Hindu from miseries of life; surely not by bowing head to a grave whose occupant has been reserved for Fires of Hell because Prophet Muhammad will stand testimony on “Qayamat Kae Roz" for the fact that Moinuddin Chisti deviated from the tenets of Islam by preaching Sufism.

So let the Hindus stop funding their own doom and help stop the dubious “Sufis" in establishing Nizam e Mustafa.

Let Kashmir not be repeated in any part of India:

To stay and live in denial mode is an art not everybody can accomplish. To hit, loot and vandalize temples and on getting a response from the harmed ones, bring in Islamophobia and play victim card is again an art not everybody can master. In Kashmir Valley and Srinagar city on every Friday when Muslims came out on streets to collect donations, Kashmiri Pandits happily contributed without realizing that they were funding their own doom! The brilliance of Muslim mind in planning the final onslaught was such that the Pandits were dumbfounded to see that they were going to be targeted and given option of conversion to Islam or death.

While the Pandits had no inkling of what was going to come; in other parts of India  the Muslim leadership assisted by Half Muslims have given enough indications of their long term political agenda and therefore the genuine Indians must be ever vigilant and devise ways and means to stop these poisonous minded Capped Bearded Moustachless specie in their tracks and put in proper place. And also, no sparing of their supporters- the Half Muslims.