PFI is Angel and RSS is Shaitan: Lalit k kaul

PFI is Angel and RSS is Shaitan                                                                                                                       Lalit K Kaul

Angel and Shaitan are entities central to Islam. Angels are committed to help those who are ever in the “service of Allah"; provide protection to and strengthen resolve of, the believers who embrace Jihad against the non-believers. Shaitan is an entity who strives to derail the believers from their path of righteousness (live the way Prophet Muhammad lived and follow the teachings of Islam in their totality). To resist the Shaitan and fight him is pious duty of a true Muslim.

The history of Muslim rule in India stands testimony to the barbarism of “believers" against the native “non-believers”, what has come to be documented in history as Islamic forced conversions, imperialism and colonialism. The history as documented by Muslim rulers and invaders as also by non-Muslim and Muslim researchers elsewhere; the apologists of Muslim imperialism, notwithstanding. Likewise, there are apologists of Christian (British, French, Spain etc.) imperialism and colonialism, but the history of their loot, plunder and barbarism is also well documented in history.

Inter Faith Conference on 30^th July:

Even post beheadings, the Hindus didn't take to violence against those who are always in the “service of Allah”. Hindus decided to boycott them, only after “Sar Tan Sae Juda” brand of followers had given a call to boycott “Kafirs".

Then, why did All India Sufi Sajjadanshin Council (AISC) convene an inter-faith conference in Constitution Club, Delhi?

The boycott call by Hindus insofar as visiting Mazaars was concerned led to tremendous fall in the revenue collection of such Mazaars as also of the business scales in the adjoining markets. This is singular reason why AISC convened the said meeting.

What Transpired in the Meeting?

The founder of AISC, Hazrat Syed Naseerudin Chisti said in the meeting that “Sar Tan Sae Juda” slogan is anti- Islamic and that it's Talibani mindset. He further said that this mindset can't be dealt with in closed doors and, therefore, there is the need to openly confront it in public domain. But, all this was retracted in two day's time!

Syed Salman Nadvi also attended the said conference. He has completely retracted from the stand taken in the inter-faith conference. He is the same person who was among the first ones to congratulate Taliban on their ascendance to political power in Afghanistan; had earlier tweeted for ISIS and is known to be a stanch supporter of Muslim Brotherhood. In a video released by him, he has said that the conference in which he participated, he didn't know that the issue of banning PFI would be raised. He ended up comparing PFI with RSS and VHP!

In the same sitting, the NSA had said that some people in the name of religion and ideology were attempting to create animosity between different religious communities and that there was the need to collectively work towards maintaining harmony between them and that in that endeavour all religious heads must work together to achieve the aim. [ Ref: Navbharat Times, 3^rd August, 2022]

The Willy Fox: Asaddudin Owaisi:

This man who is acknowledgedly a rabidly communal person and has aversion to the very sight of a Hindu temple, has in a media chat in Jaipur targeted the NSA and asked him to explain who is spreading radicalism and who hosts radicals? He has questioned RSS leader Indresh Kumar about the functioning of his organization and the kind of oath its cadre are required to take. [ Ref: Live Hindustan, Jaipur; 31^st July, 2022]

This was his response to the possibility of banning of the PFI. Directly/indirectly he defended the “Sar Tan Sae Juda” brigade in “the service of Allah”, by posing such questions to persons who have/had never anything to do with such barbaric acts. On a similar lines Syed Salman Nadvi lamented: how based on the deed of few individuals a whole organization can be banned?

Yes, Mr. Nadvi, similarly for the act of Sri Nathuram Godse, the RSS can't be held responsible; but then logic fails where a mix of religion and politics takes charge.

Yes, Mr. Owaisi the cadre takes oath to defend the integrity of Bharat; RSS works towards consolidation of Hindu samaj as one single entity enabling it to counter the Ghazwa e Hind (Ghazwa 2047) political mission, of which you are a protagonist as is clear from your Jinnah inspired politics. It's from your platform, Mr. Owaisi, that “Pakistan Zindabad" slogans are raised. RSS does not give a call like “Sar Tan Sae Juda” nor does it operate like LET, HM, JUD, HUA, ISIS, TTP and Al Qaeda, etc. It does not direct slaughter of non Hindus and nor does it encourage slave trade wherein women are sold as sex slaves (Remember Yezidi women) and if you care to read history as documented by your favourite Moguls- whose lineage you claim- you will know much more about such acts as are being perpetrated by the Jihadi organizations (as mentioned above) in modern times.

Mr. Owaisi nonchalantly says that beheading was due to the lapse in the law and order machinery. Thus, very cleverly and diplomatically he has sanctioned the acts of beheading as being in “the service of Allah”!  He has nothing to say about the intent of the act and what motivated it because that doesn't serve his and his party's long term political agenda – Ghazwa e Hind.

Make no mistake, Mr. Owaisi is a front end, one wearing a mask of being Indian, of the jihadis who are on their mission to break India into many parts and impose Sharia rule; much the same way as “mainstream" in Kashmir Valley was front end of those outfits who ensured exit of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley to establish Nizam e Mustafa.

All such men, women and outfits keep labeling RSS as a radical outfit only to hide their own activities and with the hope that RSS would be targeted one day in “secular" India when it will be ruled by “secular" forces as according to them fascism is ruling India today because terrorists who are in “the service of Allah” are not having a free run to force a progressive society into submission.

Don't take Muslim Religious Heads statements at their face value, Mr. Doval:

Did anybody expect the religious heads to say in the meeting that “Sar Tan Sae Juda” is allowed in Islam? No. Muslims are a very disciplined community in that they don't question a Fatwa or a ruling by a religious head, a mufti on a matter social, economical and/or political. No matter how big a revolutionary a Muslim may be portrayed, all his/her revolutionary instincts get buried when being face to face with a Mufti. One concrete example may illustrate how Muslim community functions and what's its hierarchy:

Sometime in late 90s or thereabout, Ms. Barkha Dutt was anchoring a show on NDTV which was being telecast live; there was in-house audience too; Ms. Shabana Azmi was prime guest & participant in the show and Shahi Imam, Bukhari, of Jama Masjid was available live. Ms. Azmi responded to a question by Ms. Dutt (social matters, if I remember correctly) and thereafter Mr. Bukhari was requested to respond to Ms. Azmi's reply. On a live TV show, the Imam said about Ms. Azmi,” iskaa kya hai, yeh toh twaif hai". The proclaimed revolutionary (communist card holder, I am told) – revolutionary to the extent that she publicly declared that Sri Ram and Sita Maa were brother and sister-  Ms. Azmi refused to respond to Imam's derogatory comment, despite persuasions by Ms. Dutt. So, that's the hold. If Shabana had to experience and endure humiliating moments in a show watched by millions, what to speak of an ordinary Muslim. Some very talented and enterprising Kashmiri Muslim girls had to wind up their initiatives because a Mufti issued a fatwa. Different matter though that the same Mufti was found dancing with Hoors in a get together! Only Sania Mirza had the guts to show these capped bearded moustachless specie their place which is in the dustbin of civilized society.

They have a political agenda as inspired by political ideology of their religion; that's how they created Pakistan. Yet, the agenda exists because that's the bottom line of a true Muslim : to work towards establishment of Sharia based governance in a society ruled over by Muslims and to work towards conversions- peacefully, if possible; else through Jihad. Some Muslim scholars have recorded thus and therefore these propensities can't be taken as acts of some anti social elements. “Sar Tan Sae Juda” and its execution is an experiment in that direction & they have succeeded in that and Owaisi is protecting them by diverting attention towards RSS.

Such Muslims who want to get along with modern times and live civilized life, don't matter as on the day of reckoning they too shall be treated as non-believers and shall be put to sword by likes of Owaisi and Ulema and Muftis. Have no doubt. While such Muslims may not be direct participants in planning and execution of Ghazwa 2047, but they can't escape contributing towards the cause as from them funds would be collected in the name of raising/renovating a Mosque; stupidly enough, the non-believers too end up paying for a cause that seeks their elimination. The Pandits in Kashmir always contributed in the name of renovating works for a Mosque and/or a Dargah without realizing that they were funding their burial.

Hindu Rashtra (Shaitan) and Islamic State (Angel):

They denounce Hindu Rashtra and Hindutva ostensibly in the name of “secularism”, but the true reason is that they see it as a threat to their political aim of establishing Islamic Nizam in India. The fear is growing by the day because they perceive Hindu consolidation and Hindu monolith as an emerging reality under “Fascist" Modi/BJP regime ideologically backed by RSS. Their aim is Nizam e Mustafa and emerging stumbling block /impediment is Hindutva. They keep experimenting to feel the pulse of Hindus and “Sar Tan Sae Juda” is one such experiment; unfortunately for them, the Hindus, for once, have come up with boycott call- a civilized way of countering mentally sick minds. And, that's the Shock that led to convening of inter- religious conference.

How determined Hindus have become to save their Motherland from the barbarism of such maniacs, only time will tell, but a beginning seems to have been made.