The Political Prostitution- Part 1:Lalit k kaul

 

The Political Prostitution- Part 1

(Traumatizing Kashmiri Society)

                                                                                          Lalit K Kaul  

Thirty years is a huge time span in one’s life and if it is a witness to complete demographic change and innumerable loss of lives in a region then experiences are too traumatizing to be explainable through words. Both the Kashmiri Muslims and Pandits have been the victims of a kind of political economy that puts humanity to shame. Political economy as engineered by the Muslim leadership without any political response from the Pandits who lacked any community leadership.

Both the communities have immensely suffered, each one for its own reason- one inflicted and the other conscientiously ingrained. The inflicted one being ‘Indian Agent’ (political discourse) and Kafir (religious discourse) wherein fitted the Pandit community and the conscientiously ingrained one being ‘the political aim’ of freeing Kashmir from the so called subjugation of India wherein fitted the Muslims.

First Logical Step:

In keeping with ‘the political aim’, the valley had to be flushed of the Pandits because 1) they had been labeled as Indian Agents and 2) the Kafir could not be a part of an Islamic state. So came up the banners held by thousands of people, the proclamations from mosques and roof tops asking the rudderless Pandits to either adopt Islam or quit the valley else get kidnapped , raped and then slaughtered. So the womenfolk were put to disgrace and men, women and children were murdered –unheard of in the past. Most of the Pandit families were visited at their residences and asked to leave else be prepared for worst. The terror was struck so deep in the psyche of the Pandits that they wholesomely started leaving the valley in panic without even caring to carry their belongings only to become refugees settled in various camps in places like Jammu, Udhampur, Riasi, Nagrota, etc, and Delhi. A prosperous middle class community had overnight become slum dwellers! A few stayed back though - not confident enough to face the unknown world – anticipating death and rape anytime sooner or later and they were not to be proved wrong.

Thus January 19, 1990 got itched in the history as the day of forced exodus of the Pandits from a place of their heritage and the day when the valley was cleansed of its aboriginals!

Sri V P Singh was the PM of India and Sri Mufti Muhammad Syed was the HM of India. When informed that the Pandits had fled the valley, the PM asked: Who Pandits!! 

Prior to the exodus of the Pandits a very smart event was engineered: arranging kidnap of Mufti Sayed’s daughter and her release in exchange of five militants. It was common knowledge that the whole event was arranged to allow large scale distribution of arms and ammunitions among the people. The Media described the insurgency as sudden explosion and political leadership and IB feigned total ignorance of any long time ongoing activities that might have led to an armed revolt against the Indian Nation State. It was pathetically compromised state machinery!!

The Genesis:

No, the eruption of insurgency and the plan for engineering large scale demographic change in the valley was not sudden and haphazard, but well planned for which preparations zealously had started in 1971; post the birth of Bangladesh. Pakistan had been partitioned and it was beyond Jamait e Islami imagination and so India had to be taught a lesson. If India was to be taught a lesson then Kashmiri Muslim had to be transformed from a timid stone pelting agitating individual to a most sophisticated arms and ammunition handler capable of challenging the Indian State without fear and that was possible only if religiously motivated: the fight (jihad) of the believers against the Kafirs.

The above paragraph is not ‘flight of an imagination’, but a real time discourse of the author with his friends (shopkeepers and classmates) in Srinagar in April/May 1971. To add further authenticity to the claim the author narrates the following for the benefit of the readers:

In Senior Chemistry Laboratory of S P College there was a Senior Gas Man by name Ghulam Muhammad Bhat who lived in neighbourhood and had family type relations with author’s family. Since 1971 to 1976, whenever both met he would say (in Kashmiri though),” Lalit you did a very good thing that you went out for higher studies and you will settle down outside Srinagar. I am very happy for you and your parents and sisters because they too will shift. Never think of settling down in Srinagar because there will be terrible bloodshed in the valley and the Pandits will be forced to leave the Valley and the preparations have already started post creation of Bangladesh. You are good and noble people and I can’t see any harm being done to you all therefore never think of coming back”. Ghulam Muhammad Bhat was member of Jamait e Islami and he always became very emotional about the author. Last time the author met him was in 1988 and had a lunch in his house and again he thanked the author for not having settled in Srinagar!!!

The Trap:

The political resolve of Jamait e Islami to avenge Bangladesh by freeing Kashmir from “Indian Subjugation” was something that Pakistan couldn’t have asked for more as it fell in line with their political philosophy of ‘a thousand cuts’ and ‘thousand years jihad’ against India. What made things easier for the Kashmiri Muslim leadership was the fact that leaders like Maqbool Bhat had established some contacts with Pakistan. So the cross border transitions and training in arms across the border started earnestly which was to be given huge impetus under General Zia Ul Haq tenure as President of Pakistan. So indoctrinated Goats were being fattened only to be slaughtered by the Indian forces as and when they took charge.

So the Muslims were not engaged in their war against the Indian State for liberation of their Kashmir, but as pawns in the hands of Pakistan to create chaos and turmoil in India. Thus the Muslim leadership chose to fight   Pakistan’s war against India which they were never going to win. This was the trap.   

False Narrative & Confused Aim: 

Any race, community or an individual may have political aspirations and may devise ways to achieve the same, but political aspirations cannot be built on false narratives. The narrative invented by the Kashmiri Muslim leadership was that India had occupied Kashmir and therefore the freedom struggle was about making her vacate it; thus the two most important historical documents 1) the Instrument of Accession and 2) the UN resolution were made irrelevant. This narrative was in tune with that of Pakistan which always moved UN to plead that India should vacate Kashmir and therefore no country or international body ever paid any heed to Pakistan’s rhetoric on Kashmir because the demand went against the grain of the UN resolution.

The so called mainstream political leadership’s stand was governed by their being in or out of power; in power – pro India, out of power – sympathizing with secessionists. This was opportunism and political prostitution at its best to remain relevant in the public domain; be visible in electronic media.

Those fighting Pakistan’s war against India too had division amongst them; one faction for Azadi and the other for merger with Pakistan. Yet they forged an alliance that consisted of several single member parties and named it the Hurriat Conference! The glaring contradiction between their respective political aims was supposedly to be resolved after India agreed to concede Kashmir! This was again opportunism and political prostitution at its best to keep a crusade on that essentially had become meaningless in view of the fact that Pakistan had failed to keep her word.

Sometime in May 1990 the author met with some Kashmiri Muslim traders and also self styled militants and asked them as to what did they think they would achieve in an arms struggle against India and the reply was  not only interesting but also showed how naïve these people were who had been indoctrinated in the name of religion; in reply they said that Pakistan had promised them that once they rise in arms against the State and immobilize Srinagar the Pakistani army would attack India and occupy Kashmir !!! Further when asked how they could accept that kind of nonsense, the reply was more indicative of their total ignorance about Indian Nation; they replied “we did not know that India was such a big country”. The disillusionment was writ large on their faces for, they had hoped that Pakistan would annex Kashmir in a day or two once Srinagar was kept under seize.     

Their replies certainly confirmed how and why the gullible can be indoctrinated so easily and made in to pawns in some unknown hands. Further while the lives were being sacrificed at the hands of the Indian security forces along with local police and army in the name of freedom movement, the leaders continued to live under the State’s protection! If this is not political prostitution what else is it? This is political prostitution because by the very demeanor of the mainstream and separatist leadership they leave no doubt in discerning minds that they are political prostitutes.    

Farcical Movement:

The Hurriat leadership never ventured in to the Jammu region; in fact all of them had very limited spheres of influence in Kashmir. It was at best a street, a mohalla or a mosque. They could never mobilize people across the valley to send across their political manifesto. There has not been any political event engineered by the Hurriat in the last 30 years except the one on 19 01 1990 (when Hurriat was nonexistent) and the other related to Amarnath Yatra when PDP Congress coalition was in power. All along it has been gun trotting and encounters between the forces and the indoctrinated ones, while the leaders enjoyed life to the full in cozy bedrooms. In fact it became so ridiculous that people came to believe that there was a pact between the leaders and the establishment and the pact was : that whenever a call would be given by the leaders they should be placed under house arrest by the law and order maintenance machinery!   

The Conspiracy and Disillusionment:

While the Hurriat continued to be on the same page as Pakistan against the Indian Union and did not think it necessary to review (with Pakistan) its jihad against India that continued to cost many young lives despite no cognizance being taken by the world community and instead labeling it as problem of Pakistan sponsored terrorism instead of liberation movement; the Indian political leadership across the spectrum wrote off the ‘Indian Agents’ who had become homeless, rootless and therefore refugees because they owed their allegiance to the Indian Union. Some crumbs were thrown at them from time to time, but no National political party ever thought of resolving the Pandit’s problem which was essentially political in nature. They chose to live with the shame that ‘Bharat Mata’ patriots had become orphans in her lap.

In the last thirty years only two Prime Ministers made a visit to some camps; 1) Sri I K Gujral (whose government was always on crutches and lasted few months) and 2) Manmohan Singh (who was a pet and therefore totally powerless) who spent his tenure at the service of the high command and brought total and unimaginable/ unprecedented disrepute and disgrace to the Chair of the PM of India and the Indian Nation.

The NDA rule also did not think it worthwhile to set the process for finding the solution for the political problem of the Pandits rolling; even after obtaining absolute majority in the Lok Sabha and claiming to be of Hindutva Ideology! The height of political prostitution was that the PM during NDA rule came up with the slogan: Kashmiriat Jamhooriat Insaaniyat! It simply implied that forced exit of the Pandits and ill treatment of their womenfolk followed by murders of males and females all fell in the category of Kashmiriat Jamhooriat Insaaniyat!       

The icing on the cake was when the Supreme Court of India refused to entertain the Pandits’ petition on various matters related to them; bringing in the ‘time bar’ technicality.

In view of the above historical facts, the question that need be asked is: Was it a political conspiracy (with the consent of all political parties and state machinery) to ensure permanent exit of the Pandits from Kashmir? The establishment of Islamic state was initiated by the Kashmiri Muslim leadership only to be given the stamp of approval by the Indian political leadership! Was not that ‘Azadi’ granted to buy some peace in the region? Else, how does one explain total apathy of all the political parties and the highest court in the land towards the plight of the Pandits? Who will answer as to why this tragic event was never ever discussed in the Parliament and why no Inquiry Commission was founded to find out why Pandits were made to flee and who were its mastermind? Why V P Singh said: “Who Pandits”

Pandits may not say it openly, but the fact of their disillusionment with the Indian Union cannot be denied.

So, can it be said that at the end of thirty years the Muslims are disillusioned with Pakistan and the Pandits with India?

Unless answers to the above question are found there may not be a true remedy to the trauma of Kashmir.