The Political Prostitution - Part 2:Lalit k kaul
The Political Prostitution -
Part 2
(The abrogation of nonexistent Article 370 for creation of UT)
alit K Kaul
It was an
unbelievably swift act coming as though a bolt out of the blue. Entire Nation
was sent reeling in to a speculative mode on this sudden action of the central
government. A day prior to it the ex Chief Minister of the erstwhile J&K
state, Sri Farooq Abdullah, had met the Prime Minister, Sri Narendra Modi. The
yearly Holy Amarnath Yatra was called off without giving any reason and without
respecting the religious sentiments of the devotees who had gathered at the
holy cave or were on their way – some half way, some three fourth way, etc- to
the holy shrine having come from length and the breadth of as vast a country as
ours expending their hard earned money and valuable time. The whole caravan was
brought to a screeching halt only to reverse its direction of expedition. So
much for the claims of the Hindutva ideology! This singular act of the powers
that be should put to rest the farcical political narrative of ‘communal versus
secular’ that ignores the precedence of the State’s interests over those of its
subjects.
Companies of
paramilitary forces were brought in and deployed in the erstwhile state of
J&K giving birth to speculations like, a major terrorist attack was in the
offing; the terrorist plan to attack the yatris had been decoded; Indo-Pak war
was to break out, and all that the fertile minds could imagine.
Prior to the
said lightening act the political leaders of different political parties in the
erstwhile state of J&K were busy warning and cautioning the central
leadership not to fiddle with Article 370 as any kind of fiddling or its
abrogation would snap the ties between the state and the Indian Union and would
lead to bloodshed. Of course such untoward and irresponsible declarations were
made by them while not in power at that point of time and were symptomatic of a
very deep rooted political corruption. By and large the people had taken their
statements as mere rhetoric of the leaders out of power.
Having
accomplished the basic tasks of making fool proof arrangements ensuring zero
violence in the state, the bill to abrogate Article 370 and 35 A was introduced
in both the houses of the Parliament and passed facilitating extermination of
the Articles from the domain defining relationship between Indian Union and the
then state of J&K.
The question
that begs an answer even today is: What possibly transpired between the Prime
Minister, Sri Narendra Modi and ex Chief Minister, Sri Farooq Abdullah a day
before this unprecedented step of calling off the Yatra and deploying
paramilitary forces in large numbers in the region was taken? While the answer
to this question may go public in some years to come, an attempt is made in the
following text to answer what of the Article 370 had remained to be abrogated;
or to be more precise: was there any such Article in vogue that needed to be
abrogated?
1.
The Genesis of Article 370:
The erstwhile
Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) state was a princely state at the time of the
independence of India and emergence of Pakistan, in the year 1947. All the
princely states (around 547 in number) were given the option of choosing to 1)
accede to India or 2) accede to Pakistan or 3) remain an independent and
sovereign state. To have a direct contiguity of the princely state of J&K
with the Indian Union, in case the
Maharaja chose to accede to it, Sir Cyril Redcliff awarded Pathankot to the
Indian Union though earlier it had been declared to be a part of Pakistan and
this readjustment of the boundaries between the two countries came to be known
as the Redcliff Award.
While nearly
all the princely states decided to accede to the India Union, the ruler of
erstwhile princely state of J&K, Maharaja Hari Singh, remained indecisive
insofar as accession to India or Pakistan was concerned, as he was more
inclined to have it as an independent sovereign state. While he was yet to
decide firmly on one of the three options, a savagely and barbarous act was
unleashed by Pakistan on October 22, 1947 when Pakistan's Pashtun tribal
militias crossed the border of the state leading to hitherto unimagined
political developments.
1a.The
Instrument of Accession:
The
Maharaja, not anticipating such an invasion, was not prepared for it. He sought
Indian government’s help to thwart the onslaught of marauding tribals aided by
Pakistan army, but Indian government refused to intervene as the princely state
had not acceded to India. Hence, to enable intervention Instrument of Accession
was signed between Maharaja Hari Singh and the Indian government. The accession
of Jammu and Kashmir was accepted by Lord Mountbatten of Burma,
Governor-General of India on 27 October 1947.
The instruments
of accession executed by the rulers, provided for the accession of states to
the Dominion of India (or Pakistan) on three subjects, namely, defence,
external affairs and communications.
Thereafter
Indian army engaged itself with the task of pushing the marauding tribals and
Pakistani army personnel beyond the frontiers of the princely state. While the
battle was on, at some point of time cease fire was declared which ended up
partitioning the princely state and for dispute resolution the matter was
referred to the United Nations Security Council. It remains unresolved till
date.
2. The Article 370:
Article 370 was a political agreement between the
Indian Union and the erstwhile truncated state of J&K. It can be said that
it was a kind of an extension of the Instrument of Accession signed between the
Maharaja of erstwhile princely state of J&K and Indian Union.
Among other features of the Act, the most important
were that the erstwhile truncated J&K state was to have its Prime Minister
(instead of Chief Minister) and Sadar-e-Riyasat (in place of Governor)
including its own flag and Constitution, etcetera. Now having a Prime Minister
(PM) implies sovereignty of the region and therefore Article 370 defined a
unique relationship between the erstwhile truncated J&K state and the
Indian Union as it was different from the full and complete merger of the other
princely states with the Indian Union.
Sri Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah was the first PM and
Sri Karan Singh the first Sadar-e-Riyasat. On August 8, 1953 Sheikh Abdullah
was dismissed from the post of PM and put under house arrest because he was
found to be dishonouring the said political agreement by way of hobnobbing with
Pakistan and simultaneously nurturing political designs of establishing an
independent sovereign state of J&K. Sheikh Abdullah’s political discourse
always remained ambivalent while trying to hold on to the reigns of political
power.
Post dethronement of Sri Sheikh Abdullah, Sri
Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad became the second PM of J&K state and continued to
be so until 1963 when his resignation- under the Kamraj Plan- was accepted by
the then PM of India Pandit Jawahar Lal
Nehru.
Thereafter Sri Ghulam Mohammad Sadiq was made the
PM, but was relegated to the Chief Minister (CM) chair in few months time. The
Sadar-e-Riyasat was re designated as Governor. After Sri Sadiq, Sri Mir Qasim
became the CM of the state. So post Bakshi period the J&K state had only
CMs and no PM. This implied that politically J&K state was now at par with
other states of India except that it had its own flag and constitution. The
relegation of PM post to that of CM implied that it was no longer a completely
sovereign state. However there were carried out many amendments in the Article
370 through various notifications duly following the process of law like,
Presidential orders of 1950, 1952, 1954 and thereafter continually during the
period 1955 – 2018. So the said Article had basically lost its significance and
role in the J&K state as more and more central laws were made applicable to
it for governance. Article 370 no longer enjoyed the status of being the basis
for the political relationship between the state and the union. It had lost its
relevance.
2a.The Indira Sheikh Agreement 1974 (Final Nail in
the Coffin):
Sri Sheikh Abdullah had been released from house
arrest and having been an acknowledged leader of the masses, the then PM of
India, Smt. Indira Gandhi sought to politically rehabilitate him. So an
agreement was signed between the representatives of the two sides that
facilitated CM post for Sheikh Abdullah.
Some interesting features of this agreement were:
1.
The
residuary powers of legislation shall remain with the State; however, Parliament
will continue to have power to make laws relating to the prevention of
activities directed towards disclaiming, questioning or disrupting the
sovereignty and territorial integrity of India or bringing about cession of
a part of the territory of India or secession of a part of the territory of
India from the Union or causing insult to the Indian National Flag, the Indian
National Anthem...
2.
No
agreement was possible on the question of nomenclature of the Governor and the
Chief Minister.....
Thus
Sri Sheikh Abdullah agreed to be the CM instead of the PM of the state and that
was a very momentous day in the history of J&K insofar as total integration
of the state with the Indian Union was concerned not forgetting the fact that
the tallest leader of Kashmiris had given his consent for the same.
So
Article 370 lost its relevance politically and over the years was further diluted by in
numerous amendments as listed in the aforesaid lines. So for all political and
administrative requirements it ceased to exist.
The
Political Blackmail:
What
remained was just a flag which nobody in the state even noticed because it
remained hoisted in a very dilapidated condition only on the secretariat
building in Srinagar. Despite a nonexistent 370 or at the best an Article that
had lost all its sheen the people of the state were fed on the falsehoods like
this Article defines the relationship between the state and the Union. Moreover
Article 35 A was misused to deliberately create discord between different
religious communities. Under the cover of special status the state was deprived
of various people oriented schemes floated by the central government.
While
every political party and its leadership knew that the Article 370 had become
meaningless yet using it as a so called special relationship that indicated
that the erstwhile J&K state was not fully integrated with India, plans
were set in motion to destabilize the region to such an extent that India would
be obliged to let go of her legitimate territory. Pakistan came very handy and
the Kashmiri leadership (the so called separatists) who led the so called AZADI
movement against the Indian State continued to be on pay rolls of Pakistan and
their security was guaranteed by the so called main stream political parties of
the J&K state! So Indian tax payer was made to pay for the security of
those who were supposed to be leading a movement seeking separation of J&K
region from India!! Could there be a bigger political prostitution than this!
Yet it continued for 30 long years which also saw forced exodus of the Kashmiri
Pandits from the valley in 1990 and thereafter. While the leaders prospered the
common man suffered trauma as they continued to lose their kith and kin.
The Union
Territory - A Political Imperative:
The nexus between the ever growing terror industry
in Pakistan and the ever increasing prosperity of the self styled leaders was
flourishing on the grounds of Article 370 which was nonexistent.
This was the highest level of political
prostitution wherein something non-existent had been kept alive threatening the
very integrity of the Indian Union. If this had to be put to an end then terror
had to be stopped in its tracks and the confusion as created by the vested
interests over the status of the erstwhile J&K state with Indian Union, had
to be cleared through a political initiative. So in the name of the abrogation
of the nonexistent Article 370, the erstwhile state was divided in to two
regions and each one given the status of Union Territory and thereby fully
integrating both with the Indian Union.
Comments
Post a Comment