Milords may read the Holy Quran before decreeing on Hijab Row: Lalit k kaul

Milords may read the Holy Quran before decreeing on Hijab Row

                                      Lalit k kaul

The case is not about human rights; not about fundamental rights; not about freedom to dress up according to one's choice; it’s about long-term political intentions of Muslim leadership supported by its religious heads to Islamize India.

Muslim religious and political heads did make their anti-India intentions very clear during their hooliganism in Shaheen Bagh in what was termed as anti-CAA protests. They wanted Muslims persecuted in Islamic countries to be welcomed in India and insisted their inclusion in CAA. What is the aim: to ensure that Muslim population grows at a rate that makes Ghazwa 2047 a reality. Imagine, Momeens persecuted in their pious lands should be welcomed in land of Kafirs- Bharat! It can’t get more ridiculous than that.

If political Islam has to be countered upfront then all “Kafirs” should read 1) the Holy Quran, 2) Sirat Rasoolallah and 3) Sahi Bukhari or Muslim Hadith. Without reading these books, it is impossible to stop political Islam in its tracks.

When the USA wanted to take on terrorism post 9/11, the Pentagon went through the above books to understand whom are they going to fight; they wanted to understand what Ideology they are up against. And, it ended up in bringing out a document for its strategists, military and the leadership that detailed the Ideology the US was up against. Likewise, the Indian State machinery and its political leadership need to understand what is it that they are up against, and for the sake of India’s survival as a civilized Nation give up vote bank politics.

Silly arguments like misguided youth; unemployed youth; alienated youth aren’t going to help India defeat political machinations of Islamists. For, that’s the youth inspired by the ideology of ISIS, HM, JUD, IS(K), Taliban, and TTP. All these outfits are inspired by the above-mentioned books and they truly believe in that being in the “Service of Allah” is a sure shot ticket to Jannat. And, that “service” is to do jihad against “people of the book”, polytheists and idolaters and force them into accepting Islam else, face death. This is fundamental to their faith.

So, it’s not so much about Hijab as it’s about working towards Islamizing Hindustan.

What does Holy Quran dictate?

No Muslim can deny that “Allah” has ordained those womenfolk including girls – that covers wives, daughters, daughter-in-laws, mothers, mother-in -laws – should confine themselves to the walls of their house and the married ones be available for their husbands all the time. If, for some unavoidable reasons, a woman must leave her house then her husband must accompany her; the unmarried ones should be accompanied by their father/brother or some trusted relative.

So, the dictate being that they should confine themselves to four walls of the house, how can they go to any school? It’s not about Hijab; the Holy Quran doesn’t dictate them to wear Hijab when they go out – not alone- due to some compulsions. The concept of Purdah isn’t same as hijab, Muslims should know.

What’s the Noise about?

It’s about making their presence felt and reminding idolaters that they are here to stay and carry out the Jihad as ordained in their books.

It’s not about religious freedom; it’s about Muslims not following their religion and disobeying the “command of Allah” and yet ever on the job of creating disturbances in a peace-loving civilized society only to test the chances of their success in fooling the uninformed who talk only about the Constitution of India. The Muslim leadership has been always cunning to swear by Constitution if that enables Muslims to put their two feet in two boats. While Jihad against the non-believers is the unflinching aim, first step towards that is to penetrate into administrative set-up by forcing their point of view in the name of Islam- which they don’t follow in any case and by any standards- by citing various Articles of the Constitution to support their cause; the courts which are bound by the Constitution do fall prey to such devious machinations as has been undoubtedly proved by the stalemate in the SC Bench. And, this is their victory.

To penetrate into administrative set-up is exactly what they did to oust Kashmiri Pandits from their land of birth, culture and heritage. Ousting Pandits from the Valley was being in the “Service of Allah”.

Three Judge Bench to hear the petition:

Hear what? Hijab isn’t the issue. Can the SC Bench tell the petitioners what Allah has commanded for womenfolk and girls? Can any court discuss religion within its premises? No. And, it’s this disability of the courts that encourages the Jihadis to bring in the matters like: right to education; right to follow religion; right to dress and all that. What meets the eye in a secular court is not what’s intended by the petitioners/Jihadis. Working within the parameters of a Secular State, is the reason why a split decision came from the SC Bench.

Yet, it can be easily argued in the courts that if Muslims are allowed to carry their so-called religious symbols into the Secular World, then what about people of other faiths! Even if the courts allow people of all religions to carry their symbols on person, yet it shall be a victory for the Jihadis as they would have won the first round/step in their march towards establishing Nizam e Mustafa in Bharat to have the pleasure of 72 Hoors in Jannat.

Can Judgement come in favour of Jihadis?

There are many parameters that need to be factored in, to answer this question and yet it can’t be answered with certainty; like, the understanding of a judge about the society and his/ her political affiliations; strength of the arguments respectively of petitioner and respondent- within Secular parameters- may swing the decree in its favour; the political mood in the country- that’s to say what kind of judgement shall have what kind of repercussions; for example, can there ever be a judgement in Bharat that disallows construction of a temple?

In summary, there is no judiciary in the civilized world that’s indifferent to socio-political realities.

If decision comes in favour of Hijab with a rider that people of other faiths too may display their respective symbols; it will leave Indian society highly polarized and which wouldn’t be a desirable portend. The deeply entrenched feeling among a vast majority of non-Muslims is that Muslims are up to a game and therefore need to be countered. Shaheen Bagh has left no doubt in their minds and recent disclosure of the plans of Ghazwa 2047, and the “Kashmir Files” that doesn’t even show 1% of what was done to Pandits in the Valley has further convinced them that they need to watch the Muslim politics very carefully and vigilantly to counter their aim of Islamizing Hindustan.

Therefore, it’s more likely that the petitioners appeal will be dismissed by a Three Judge Bench of the SC. What shall the Jihadis come up with then? It remains to be seen.