The Legacy of AIMIM and Asaddudin Owaisi Duel with Mohan Bhagvat:Lalit k kaul

 

The Legacy of AIMIM and Asaddudin Owaisi's Duel with RSS Chief Mohan Bhagvat                                                                                                               Lalit K Kaul

In an audio system if surrounding noise has decibels higher than the signal, then signal gets submerged in noise and information content is lost beyond retrieval. Sri Asaddudin Owaisi's outburst against the message (signal) of Sri Mohan Bhagvat can be likened to a corrupting noise that sinks the signal. The problem of signal retrieval becomes intractable if multiple noise sources with different characteristics are active simultaneously; in this case, the additional noise was created by Sri D Raja of CPI. But, has the signal of Sri Mohan Bhagvat got lost in Noise?

The Q is: Why Sri Asaddudin Owaisi goes hyper when it comes to RSS? And, why do Communists support him in his tirade against RSS? In order to find an answer to these Qs, it is imperative to know the political doctrine, based on a divisive ideology, of AIMIM that its founder chose to adopt voluntarily.

AIMIM is Progeny of MIM:

MIM (Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen) literally means ‘Council for Unity of Muslims’ and that shows its intent much like Sri Sheikh Abdullah's ‘Muslim Conference (MC)' and Sri M. A. Jinnah's ‘Indian Muslim League (IML)'. What's clear is that the Indian Muslim politicians chose to speak only for Muslims and not for Indian people as a whole and history is witness to their ideologies based on anti-India narrative essentially born out of Hindu hatred. While IML succeeded in partitioning Indian Subcontinent (no matter how much the apologists of Hindu- Muslim unity blame British for the same), the ‘mainstream' M/NC along with its other local Muslim based outfits succeeded in traumatizing the Kashmiri Society in their endeavour to achieve one more partition of India only to enhance geo-political boundaries of their ‘soul-mate' Pakistan.

What did MIM stand for?

It was founded and shaped by Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan Qiledar of Hyderabad State in the presence of Ulma-e-Mashaeqeen in 1927 as a pro Nizam party. The first meeting was held in the house of Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan on 12 November 1927. The MIM shunned integration with India and instead, advocated to set up "Muslim dominion" in India. MIM wanted a Muslim country to be carved out of Hyderabad as South Pakistan.  Its Razakars fought against Indian Union for independence of Hyderabad State. MIM leader Qasim Rizwi was jailed after Indian annexation of Hyderabad State and released in 1957 on a condition that he would migrate to Pakistan where he was granted asylum.

Before leaving, Qasim Rizvi held a meeting with other leaders of MIM to hand over its reins to one of them, but they declined the offer on the pretext that they had grown too old to shoulder the responsibility. In that meeting Abdul Wahed Owaisi, a lawyer, who was present as an observer volunteered to take the responsibility of whatever remained of the MIM and ended up organizing it into the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM). Thus, Hyderabad State level ‘Council for Unity of Muslims’ was sought to be elevated to an ‘All India Council for Unity of Muslims’ and in effect it had taken up the role of IML of Sri M. A. Jinnah. So, that's the legacy that Asaddudin Owaisi carries on his shoulders while masquerading as an Indian and patriot. Sri Abdul Wahed Owaisi is grandfather of Sri Asaddudin Owaisi.

The Hindu Hatred openly professed by AIMIM Leaders:

AIMIM UP president Shaukat Ali was booked on charges of disturbing communal harmony, a day after he made provocative statements against Hindus at a rally in Sambhal. The video where he said that Muslims ruled over Hindus for 832 years and Hindus did 'ji huzoor' with hands folded to Muslim rulers. In his speech, he also said Muslims marry twice but respect both wives while Hindus marry one but keep three mistresses and further went on to say that Hindus are worms…

A decade ago, leader of AIMIM, Akbaruddin Owaisi made statements derogatory to Hindus at two separate speeches given in Nirmal and Nizamabad towns of Hyderabad. Akbaruddin, who is the younger brother of AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi, was seen on camera telling a cheering crowd that “25 crores” (Muslims) would easily take on “100 crores” (Hindus) if police are removed for 15 minutes. He is also known for mocking Hindu deities.

In presence of Asaddudin Owaisi, Waris Pathan made the following statements while addressing an anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) rally at Kalaburagi in North Karnataka.

“We need to work together; we need to snatch our Azadi. Time has now come to achieve Azadi, if we cannot achieve it, we should snatch it. They were mocking us for hiding behind women (during anti-CAA protests). Do not forget, these are lionesses who has come out yet and you are already afraid of these women. Be aware and know what happens if we all (Muslims) unite together,” Further he roared, "We (minority) are only 15 crores of the population but if we take streets then we are bhari on majority of population Remember this Hindus"

All the above speeches are testimony to AIMIM's ideology of Hindu hatred and anti- India doctrine. And they assiduously propagate Jinnah doctrine that led to the partition of Indian Subcontinent and it's clear from the above speeches that AIMIM is preparing Muslims for engineering another partition. The role played by IML and MIM is being played by AIMIM. The major contribution of IML during Indian freedom movement was instigation of Moplah riots and Direct Action Day and AIMIM’s long term planning is the same; let nobody harbour any doubts on that.

The RSS Factor:

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) was founded in 1925 by K.B Hedgewar in response to a series of small- and large-scale riots between Hindus and Muslims across northern India. Hedgewar believed the riots were Muslim riots as he [Hedgewar] claimed that in every single case, “it is they [Muslims] who start them.” Such of those Hindus who were and continue to be victims of such riots will stand by Hedgewar perception.

In the Sangh’s mission statement, Hedgewar wrote: “The Hindu culture is the life-breath of Hindustan. It is therefore clear that if Hindustan is to be protected, we should first nourish the Hindu culture. It is the duty of every Hindu to do his best to consolidate the Hindu society.”

If there could be ‘Council for Unity of Muslims' what could be against consolidation of Hindu society! The RSS doesn't work against the integrity of India; doesn't aspire to balkanize it unlike the ‘Council for Unity of Muslims'.

Why the likes of Asaddudin Owaisi are ever ready to pounce on RSS and label it as communal? The answer to this Q is that AIMIM and its supporters see RSS as a threat to their political manifesto of balkanizing India. It has come more under attack after Modiji became the PM of India in 2014. What's troubling AIMIM and Communists including ‘Bharat Jodo Yatra' party is that bomb blasts across India have ceased to be since 2014 and that J&K is now integrated with the Indian Union without superfluous conditions. The turn of events in J&K has come as an irreparable shock to “secularists” and pro-Pak elements masquerading as Indian nationals and patriots. Since Modiji grew up in RSS therefore all his initiatives are seen as inspired by RSS ideology. Further ‘consolidation of Hindu culture’ is unacceptable to AIMIM and its ilk as it's anti-thesis of their ideology of intolerance to all non-believers. Accommodative nature of Hindu culture has the potential of taking along with it different faiths and belief systems and thereby throw up an all inclusive (integrative) Indian society which would be a real deterrent to forces of inter-community hatred, chaos and disintegration and that's what the AIMIM , the “mainstream" outfits in Kashmir and others of their ilk hate to envisage.

Therefore, even the calls like “sar tan sae juda' are not condemned, but the blame for it is put on RSS; the ‘Bharat Jodo Yatra” party ex- president Sri Rahul Gandhi had the audacity to say in a press conference abroad that RSS was more dangerous than LET! And the communists instead of questioning the Muslim political and religious leaders as to why Indian Muslim youth was engaging in terrorism against India, blame RSS and BJP for driving a wedge between Hindus and Muslims. The political ideology of Muslim political outfits and Communists is same in that they don't subscribe to the system of Parliament as mode of governance because they don't believe in democratic dispensation and they are natural political allies. The people of India who believe in a secular and democratic dispensation as a matter of faith need to guard against this combine for saving the Indian integrity and also from going into a state of anarchy.

The Statements of AIMIM Leaders and that of Sri Mohan Bhagvat:

Seen in the context of the reproduced statements of AIMIM leaders in the aforesaid lines, the statement/ advise of Sri Mohan Bhagvat seems to be in order and the response of Sri Asaddudin Owaisi seems to have the intention of provoking the gullible and uninformed among his community. Mr. Owaisi it was not “Allah's Will" that those who created Pakistan stayed back, but it was with the intention of further partitioning India and that's what your outfit has been at and is supported by Muslim clergy and institutions. The anti-CAA hooliganism stated it all beyond any scope for doubt. Therefore, RSS role becomes all the more important in consolidating Hindu culture and heritage if only to thwart your designs of balkanizing India. If Hindus don't unite, it will be at their own peril.

Mr. Owaisi, you might have created high decibel noise reinforced by your communist comrade, but the signal of Sri Mohan Bhagvat has cut through the noise, even while it violated laws of communication theory, because Hindus have not forgotten AIMIM leaders' statements that are inimical to the Indian integrity and Statehood.