Nuh Hooliganism Need to Demolish Idelogy:Lalit k kaul

 

              Nuh Hooliganism by Muslims: the need to demolish the Ideology & not just Concrete

                                                                                                                                                          Lalit K Kaul

It has become a routine, since few years now. Whenever there is a Hindu religious procession the Muslims indulge in stone pelting, rioting and plunder; whereas during none of the Muslim festivals/religious processions the Hindus reciprocate in the similar fashion, but on the other hand ensure that Muslims festivals pass off peacefully. Hindus experienced rioting in Bhopal, Moradabad, Delhi and Patna etcetera and now it is Nuh in Haryana. A year or so ago, I did a Google search on “Rioting in 20^th Century India” spanning pre and post independent India. Whereas the pogroms like Direct Action Day and Moplah riots against Hindus as directed by leaders like Mohammad Ali Jinnah and others stand out to expose the limitless barbarism they are capable of inflicting on non-Muslims, there were other riots too engineered by them essentially on a Hindu festival day.

The Command of Allah:

The Q is: Are those who initiate communal riots misguided youth? Are they anti-social elements? Are they un-civilized? No, they are not. In committing such barbaric acts they are motivated by the ideology that’s detailed out by their Allah and put into practice by their religious heads and political leadership. The political aim of Muslim leadership- political and religious- is to balkanize India yet again and they take it as the pious duty of a true Muslim to do so. Therefore, the process of indoctrinating the impressionable youth to achieve their aim is an ongoing process. It is amazing that the indoctrinated ones who lead the riots may not have sufficient food grains in their houses, but they are ever ready with stockpiles of stones, swords, sticks, country pistols and petrol bombs. This implies that any attack on Hindus is not spontaneous but well planned in time. And, they bide their time until they are sure that they have enough numbers and resources to go on the onslaught to be in the “Way of Allah”.

In post independent India they lived up to the command of their Allah when the indoctrinated ones committed genocide of a miniscule minority in Kashmir Valley- the Kashmiri Pandit Community. Even if it is granted that they had genuine political aspirations in regard to the geo-political status of Kashmir, there is no way a miniscule minority like Kashmiri Pandit community could have thwarted them in their plans, but The Command had to be followed by a true Muslim. Likewise, one sees what Pakistan (pious place for Moemeen) has done to her minorities and whatever indignities heaped upon them by way of abductions followed by forced conversions, and demolition of Temples, Gurudwaras and Churches is all motivated by The Command of Allah. When one reads “A Bend in the Ganges” by Manohar Malgonkar one comes to know how riots were started by Muslims in West Punjab, just when it came to be known that Pakistan had been formed, that led to loot, arson and mass scale murders of Sikhs with whom they had lived together for centuries. The history repeated in Kashmir. All this was accomplished to follow The Command that non-Muslims (Kafirs) have no Right to Live. And, this is The Ideology that supposedly no true Muslim should defy- this indoctrination of impressionable youth by Muslim leadership is a continuous process.

If the above paragraphs show a bias against the Muslims then let’s see what our leaders who fought for our independence from the front had to say about Indian Muslims and their leanings.

In his prayer meeting of 12 September 1947, Gandhiji said:

Let us know our own dharma. In the light of our dharma I would tell the people that our greatest duty is to see that the Hindus do not act in frenzy, nor the Sikhs indulge in acts of madness. . . . I appeal to the Muslims that they should open-heartedly declare that they belong to India and are loyal to the Union. If they are true to God and wish to live in the Indian Union, they just cannot be enemies of the Hindus. And I want the Muslims here to tell the Muslims in Pakistan who have become the enemies of the Hindus, not to go mad: ‘If you are going to indulge in such madness, we cannot co-operate with you. We will remain faithful to the Union, and salute the Tricolour. We have to follow the order of the Government’.

Islam as understood by Dr. B R Ambedkar:

The Bhim-Meem enthusiasts may read it more carefully.

1.       Hindu Kafir is not worthy of respect: “For Muslims Hindu is a Kafir and Kafir is not worthy of respect. He is born in a lowly family and has no social status. Therefore, a nation ruled by Kafirs that nation is Dar-Ul-Harb for Muslims. In such a situation there is no need to adduce evidence and prove that Muslims will not accept Hindu rule” That’s why he wanted all Muslims to migrate to Pakistan as he was sure that Muslims shall not accept Hindu rule and again fight for their rule and again call it Dar-Ul-Harb.

2.       Muslim Brotherhood is only for Muslims: “Muslims are a closed community and discriminate between Muslims and non-Muslims and this is very clear. Muslim brotherhood is not universal brotherhood as it is limited to Muslims only. There is only hatred and enmity for all those who fall outside Muslim community. Another undesirable characteristics is that its way of social organization and administration is always at variance (in conflict) with the local government’s norms of administration and this is because their loyalty is not to the country they live in, but to the religious faith to which they belong. For any Muslim to place his loyalty to his country of residence is a taboo. Wherever there is Muslim rule therein their loyalties (faith) lie. In other words, Islam does not allow a true Muslim to consider India as their Motherland and Hindus as their immediate relation. Perhaps that was the reason that Maulana Mohammad Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim preferred to get his mortal remains buried in Jerusalem and not in India.”

3.       It is difficult to differentiate between a communal and nationalistic Muslim: It is difficult to understand the difference between the communal Muslims who founded League and the nationalistic ones. It is very doubtful that nationalistic Muslims are truly in agreement with the Congress world-view of a nation that would differentiate them from Muslim League. It is said that in reality most of the Congressmen believe that there is no difference between the two and that the nationalistic Muslims within the Congress are like guard (base camp) of the army of the communal Muslims. And this understanding does not seem to be misplaced when one remembers that leader of the nationalistic Muslims, Dr. Ansari,  had refused to oppose communal agenda of communal Muslims….”

Sardar Patel’s 1948 Calcutta Maidan speech in which he conveyed to the Muslims that their loyalty lay with Pakistan. Here are some clippings:

Sardar Patel said, “The Muslims who are still in India, many of them helped in the creation of Pakistan… Has their nation changed overnight? I don’t understand how it changed so much. They now say that they are loyal and ask why their loyalty is being questioned. So I reply why are you questioning us, ask yourself. This is not something you should ask us.”

“I said one thing; you created Pakistan, good for you. They say that Pakistan and India should come together. I say please refrain from saying such things. Let Pakistan become heaven itself, we will enjoy the cool breeze coming from it (audience breaks out into raucous laughter),” he continued.

It wasn’t the only time that Sardar Patel would speak of Indian Muslims having loyalties towards Pakistan.

Why did they say so?

Nobody can accuse them of being communal; even in wildest of their dreams. Even while the leaders like Dr. B R Ambedkar and Sri Lala Lajpat Rai expressed their opinions that all Muslims should go over to Pakistan because they had asked for it, the Indian National Congress with its world-view could not have enforced it. So, those stayed back were allowed to do so with a fond hope that they would be loyal to Mother India. But that was not to be! It is like when the US opened up with China for trade and cultural exchange, its leadership did so in the hope that once material prosperity came to China and it integrated with world economics then it would renounce communist regime to become a democratic dispensation. But that was not to be! For the simple reason that for the ruling and religious elite to survive, the ideology that sustains them cannot be forsaken. Similarly while the Muslims in India did gain economically and materially like their Hindu counterparts yet the schism between Kafir and Moemeen remained as ordained by the Muslim leadership.

The leaders who said so had, perhaps, thoroughly understood Muslim psyche. Yet Sri M K Gandhi hoped that Muslims would remain loyal to India! What we are witnessing today is only the coming true of the words of those great personalities. Muslim leadership refuses to integrate the Muslims with heterogeneous Indian society. Opposition to Uniform Civil Code and triple Talaq are two such examples.

What Next? 

The political leadership of India needs to internalize this fundamental truth about Muslim political and religious leadership that they are governed by the “Law of Allah” no matter what the likes of Asaddudin Owaisi and his vote bank aspirants may say about why his community chose to stay back in India. That in Patna Ghazwa-e-Hind gang was unearthed is not a myth; the activities of PFI are not a myth and not also those who offered themselves and went to fight for ISIS when Baghdadi was in command. The role of Muslim leadership in Khilafat Movement is not a myth and nor is Direct Action Day, Moplah riots and Kashmiri Pandit Genocide. The monumental task before the Indian leadership, if they want to ensure that India remains one entity and is not governed by Sharia Law, is to devise ways and means to demolish The Ideology that perpetuates intolerance and hatred against the non-Muslims. The Nuh incident is the assertion of that Ideology and its perpetrators (Muslim leadership) have sent a strong message across and the message is: we are regrouping while waiting for our numbers to grow so that we can subjugate Hindus and other non-Muslims to fulfill the “Will of Allah”. Pogroms like Nuh and the earlier ones cannot be stopped by demolishing the properties of perpetuators, but by demolishing the Ideology that motivates them.